Lithuania: EC Urges Lithuania to Strengthen Sanctions on Multinationals for Tax Avoidance

On 2 October 2026, the European Commission formally urged Lithuania to adopt more stringent sanctions against multinational enterprises that engage in aggressive tax avoidance schemes. The recommendation follows a comprehensive review of Lithuania’s implementation of the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and the OECD BEPS Action Plan. The Commission highlighted that current Lithuanian penalties are insufficient to deter profit shifting and base erosion, particularly in the digital services and intra-group financing sectors. The proposed measures include higher financial penalties, extended statute of limitations for tax audits, and mandatory disclosure rules for cross-border arrangements meeting specific hallmarks. The Lithuanian Ministry of Finance has indicated it will draft amendments to the Law on Tax Administration and the Corporate Income Tax Law by Q1 2027, with expected entry into force on 1 January 2028. Affected enterprises should immediately assess their transfer pricing documentation, controlled foreign company (CFC) positions, and hybrid mismatch exposures to ensure alignment with the forthcoming regime.

Key Takeaways

  • Enhanced Penalty Framework: The EC recommends raising maximum fines for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation and country-by-country reporting obligations from 0.5% to 2% of annual turnover, with potential criminal liability for repeated intentional violations.
  • Mandatory Disclosure Regime: Lithuania will be required to implement DAC6‑style hallmarks for cross-border arrangements, compelling taxpayers and intermediaries to report structures involving low‑tax jurisdictions, deductible cross‑border payments, or hybrid instruments within 30 days of implementation.
  • Extended Audit Powers: Tax authorities will gain a 10‑year look‑back period for cases involving concealed income or fraudulent schemes, up from the current 5‑year limit, significantly increasing the compliance burden for multinational groups with historic restructuring activities.

Disclaimer: This article is compiled and summarized by the AI based on publicly available information and is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute any form of formal tax advice, legal opinion, or basis for performance. Please consult a qualified professional tax advisor or legal counsel for tax advice.

Source: Read Official Announcement